Which statement is true when the FCC and central controls are not in the same location regarding survivability?

Which statement is true when the FCC and central controls are not in the same location regarding survivability?

• A. Additional survivability requirements apply
• B. No extra requirements
• C. System becomes non-compliant
• D. Fire command center must be upstairs

Answer: (A)

Survivability of the fire alarm system is the idea here. When the Fire Command Center (FCC) and the central controls aren’t in the same location, there’s a greater risk that a single event could disable both spots. Because of that, codes require additional survivability measures to keep the system operating and communicable even if one location is damaged or isolated. In practice, this means extra provisions like independent power for critical components, redundant communication paths, and alternate means of monitoring or annunciation so the system can continue to function from a different location or through separate channels. So, the statement that extra survivability requirements apply is the correct one. It’s not that no extra requirements exist, nor that the system becomes non-compliant or that the FCC must be upstairs. The requirement is about ensuring continued operation through added redundancy when the FCC and controls aren’t co-located.

Survivability of the fire alarm system is the idea here. When the Fire Command Center (FCC) and the central controls aren’t in the same location, there’s a greater risk that a single event could disable both spots. Because of that, codes require additional survivability measures to keep the system operating and communicable even if one location is damaged or isolated. In practice, this means extra provisions like independent power for critical components, redundant communication paths, and alternate means of monitoring or annunciation so the system can continue to function from a different location or through separate channels. So, the statement that extra survivability requirements apply is the correct one. It’s not that no extra requirements exist, nor that the system becomes non-compliant or that the FCC must be upstairs. The requirement is about ensuring continued operation through added redundancy when the FCC and controls aren’t co-located.